Facebook Developers

all: forum server is going bonkers, u need to refresh if u can't see the image.

[image removed by administrator]

first it was red riding hood, now its ms gingerbread. someone at slide must have some serious cunnilingus deficiency.

[image removed by administrator]

this isn't a coincidence of nature, neither is it artistic, its the photoshop of a glorious PENIS on a TREE.  The branch didn't happen to grow out like that. Really? Yes. Really

FOUND TODAY.

If you had clicked on these, it would have been sent to ALL YOUR FRIENDS by Funwall. ALL.

senatuskienlee wrote:

FOUND TODAY.

If you had clicked on these, it would have been sent to ALL YOUR FRIENDS by Funwall. ALL.

Thanks Kien, for telling us.  TOO LATE.

It is a wonder I still have a job.  Talk about embarrassing.  But NOOO.  This is just an accident, right?? 


(Steve: If you are reading this, now you understand) 

Gotta love though how FunWall and alike get away with this crap, while any other developer that even has a slightly crass word somewhere in their application gets a relentless smackdown.

Sorta makes you wonder how much $ is changing hands under the table... it's almost like Facebook is an Indonesian company, just bribe your way past rules or something...

hehe the wall's getting too fun....
My problem with whoever runs funwall is that those innapropriate images can be seen in their frontpages, and they still ignore them.  Now that tells me two things, either facebook hasn't warn them they should start monitoring stuff like this, or they did, but for some reason missed our posts saying it's STILL GOING ON....

Well, senatus, you do know sex sells -- it's the #1 way to get eyes on your app fast, unfortunately since there's no way to guarantee you're not showing some hardcore porn to a bunch of giggly minors... you know.

Anyway, I figure that if FunWall/SuperWall can get away with it it won't be long before we start seeing other apps doing it too using the justification of "yeah but they can, so why can't we". Unfortunate.

Guess I'll go focus my apps on Bebo and MySpace, they at least seem to make an effort

funwall should enclose *all* images and videos in <fb:18-plus>
*nothing* that i see on some friends' funwalls is appropriate for (or interesting to) minors

Don't get me wrong, I'm not against selling sex, it's how I used to make a living in the 90's -- but selling sex to minors is bad. The moment someone forks over some credit card details one can be relatively sure that it ain't some pimply faced 12 year old who's looking to get off. (Unless they use daddy's credit card, in which case it's the parents that need a decent talking to).

I'm just quite surprised that FunWall is getting away with this. Even if it -is- user uploaded content, they should be screening that crap.

ydiw wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not against selling sex, it's how I used to make a living in the 90's -- but selling sex to minors is bad. The moment someone forks over some credit card details one can be relatively sure that it ain't some pimply faced 12 year old who's looking to get off. (Unless they use daddy's credit card, in which case it's the parents that need a decent talking to).

I'm just quite surprised that FunWall is getting away with this. Even if it -is- user uploaded content, they should be screening that crap.

urm. sorry? you used to turn tricks in the 90s?

LOL. J/K.

I know what you're saying... and yes the point of this all is how Slide gets away with it all.

Last edited by senatuskienlee (2008-05-02 11:40:28)

senatuskienlee wrote:

ydiw wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not against selling sex, it's how I used to make a living in the 90's -- but selling sex to minors is bad. The moment someone forks over some credit card details one can be relatively sure that it ain't some pimply faced 12 year old who's looking to get off. (Unless they use daddy's credit card, in which case it's the parents that need a decent talking to).

I'm just quite surprised that FunWall is getting away with this. Even if it -is- user uploaded content, they should be screening that crap.

urm. sorry? you used to turn tricks in the 90s?

LOL. J/K.

I know what you're saying... and yes the point of this all is how Slide gets away with it all.

Well, I guess in a way I did Nah, ran some 18+ sites, built back-end stuff for others, generally spent a lot of time and earned a good living peddling smut to adults.

Guess Slide gets away with it because they're a slippery bunch... ( see what I did there? )

But it still annoys the hell out of me that they -are- apparently getting away with it. Last time this subject came up in post sequence II  there's a distinct memory from some FB dude that they were going to take a look at it. Guess they did, liked it, and spent the rest of the day in a furious fapathon

no. cos i am on fb's side, and not on slide's side.

and i got little cousins on facebook, whose parents i have to answer to. so this stays here.